In the time since I chose ext4 for these systems, btrfs seems to have come a long way, so the choice may be harder today. use ZFS only w/ ECC RAM. Interestingly, the first version of the Ext4 filesystem, the Extended filesystem (“Ext”), came out in 1992 for the Minix OS. If you do hardware RAID, with a dedicated RAID card, just do not use ZFS please, it will break your data at some point. 가능. Comentado el. 2 See what others are saying What is btrfs? Btrfs, which stands for B-tree file system, is a modern and advanced file system that supports many features, such as snapshots, compression,. It's the fastest option bar none if you have enough RAM. This is fundamental in determining the file system’s capacity. XFS is about as mainline as a non-ext filesystem gets under Linux. 현재 Ext4는 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6의 기본 파일 시스템으로 단일 파일 및 파일 시스템 모두에서 최대 16 TB 크기 까지 지원합니다. Resizing (growing) is possible with btrfs and xfs. ran btrfs balance to balance all btrfs volumes. 11. xfs with ftype=1, ext4: fuse-overlayfs: any filesystem: devicemapper: direct-lvm: btrfs: btrfs: zfs: zfs: vfs: any filesystem: Other. In the future, Linux distributions will gradually shift towards BtrFS. 4 To 4. 如果您追求高度的数据完整性和强大的快照功能，Btrfs可能是更好的选择。. But they come with the smallest set of features compared to newer filesystems. one of the still “beta” features of btrfs. 5. Overall, except for application launch time, benchmark results show that ZFS is the slowest file system in terms of read and write speed due to its COW operating type, while EXT4 is usually the fastest system. Small_Light_9964 • 1 yr. The XFS one on the other hand take around 11-13 hours!With Bcachefs on its trek towards the mainline Linux kernel, this week I conducted some benchmarks using the very latest Bcachefs file-system code and compared its performance to the mainline Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system competitors on both rotating and solid-state storage. XFS does not require extensive reading. Btrfs vs. Both Btrfs and Ext4 have their own advantages. BTRFS VS EXT4 performance in Raid 1. The most commonly used are Ext4, Btrfs, XFS, and ZFS which is the most recent file system released back in 2018. Ext4 is the default system for most Distros. and. Storage Manager Last updated: Apr 18, 2023 Purpose This article compares the different file systems to help you decide which one to choose when creating a. Generally, would go with btrfs. But again, there's no real point in going with btrfs if only using two drives. Allerdings hatte BTRFS eine deutlich bessere Leistung bei kleinen Dateien als EXT4. On the HDD the Bcachefs performance was just behind EXT4 but doing much better than Btrfs though not nearly as fast as XFS in this. Considering that the btrfs will be able for spanning over the multiple hard drives, it is a very good thing that it can support 16 times more drive space than the ext4. EXT4 is better for small files and day to day use. . We may have lengthy talk on ext vs XFS vs f2fs and btrfs vs zfs and there are many more points to be mentioned, but for regular users. Phoronix: Linux 5. On the other hand BTRFS, while mainlined, has many important issues and performance problem (the common suggestion for databases or VMs is to disable CoW which, in turn, disabled checksumming - which is, frankly, not an acceptable answer). 2. F2FS vs. It's stable and time-proven. Granted, i just use the automatic partition creater at setup, so it still uses ext4 for the /boot and /boot/efi partitions. 数据场和大存储池会揭示关于 ext4、XCF 以及 btrfs 不同的场. Ext4 file systems. I am getting too many input/output errors with my 3TB HDD NTFS hard disk for main files. Reasons why I use LVM/ext4: I'm used to it. How do the major file systems supported by Linux differ from each other?Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested in their out-of-the-box state / default mount options. The reason that Ext4 is often recommended is that it is the most used and trusted filesystem out there on Linux today. EXT4 has entirely different design goals, none of which are data integrity. From what I read. For the most. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. To reserve an external journal with a specified size when you create an XFS file system, specify the -l logdev=device,size=size option to the mkfs. It's the only file system out of the box read/write/format supported by Windows, Mac, and Linux. It's not the fastest but not exactly a slouch. To reserve an external journal with a specified size when you create an XFS file system, specify the -l logdev=device,size=size option to the mkfs. Die Funktionen umfassen eine transparente Komprimierung, Prüfsummen und. ext4 with m=0 ext4 with m=0 and T=largefile4 xfs with crc=0 mounted them with: defaults,noatime defaults,noatime,discard defaults,noatime results show really no difference between first two, while plotting 4 at a time: time is around 8-9 hours. Using Btrfs, just expanding a zip file and trying to immediately enter that new expanded folder in Nautilus, I am presented with a “busy” spinning graphic as Nautilus is preparing to display the new folder contents. Approach 1: Build your own kernel, and tweak it's build config to pre-link btrfs. , power failure) could be acceptable. 14 SSD Benchmarks With Btrfs vs. Btrfs（技术预览）" Collapse section "6. The preferable option depends on your specific needs and priorities. Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested in their out-of-the-box state / default mount options. I'd say ext, because it is faster, and because you asking means, that you don't know how to use btrfs features, otherwise the choice is obvious: need snapshots -> btrfs, need reflinks -> XFS, default -> ext4. 0 File-System. This would be an interesting test. So please enlighten me, where is btrfs better and where is it worse or just significantly different than ZFS. I do use f2fs on all of my Raspberry Pi SD cards where it gives a huge performance boost over btrfs or ext4. Fwiw, I think XFS still handles huge files better than EXT, so there are reasons to use it. The use of checksums in Btrfs can prevent silent data corruption. Business, Economics, and Finance. Ext4 seems better suited for lower-spec configurations although it will work just fine on faster ones as well, and performance-wise still better than btrfs in most cases. EarthyFeet. The Ext4 file system is a very old file system and it has been used on the Linux operating system for a long, long time. So I did two rounds: the. Those curious about the many changes found for the file-systems and other sub-systems within the Linux 3. 15 Comparing KPTI/Retpoline. g. The fourth generation File System of the Ext (Extended) file system family. Rationale is native Linux nature, vs xfs being Linux supported. To mount the XFS file system so that it uses the external journal, specify the -o logdev=device option to the. Journaling ensures file system integrity after system crashes (for example, due to power outages) by keeping a record of file system. Ext4 is built on older technology, so it lacks modern file-system features found in systems like E2FS and BtrFS. Various internet sources suggest that XFS is faster and better, but taking into account that they also suggest that EXT4 is. 여러 가지의 HDD를 장착하여 사용을 하신다면 사진이나 중요한 자료들을 저장하는 드라이브에는. For the adventurous: you can define block devices on btrfs and use ext4 on those block devices (ext4 on btrfs). There are results for “single file” with O_DIRECT case (sysbench fileio 16 KiB blocksize random write workload): ext4 1 thread: 87 MiB/sec. Be sure to change the /etc/fstab to reflect the change ( type to btrfs and fs_passno [the last field] to 0 as Btrfs does not do a file system check on boot). Precisely, it seems to be 50%. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. This is because BTRFS is optimized for handling small files, while EXT4 can struggle with multiple small files due to its delayed allocation of. 4. Backups and CoW, are why I use btrfs. If you are running a more stable system like Dabian based Linux EXT4 is a better choice because it's faster file system but not as easy to revert. 불가능. xfs 4 threads: 97 MiB/sec. Tenga en cuenta que el uso de inode32 no afecta a los inodos que ya están asignados con números de 64 bits. This includes workload that creates or deletes large numbers of small files in a single thread. g. ago. Interestingly, the first version of the Ext4 filesystem, the Extended filesystem (“Ext”), came out in 1992 for the Minix OS. NTFS. BTRFS solves all the problems I had so far: supports online resizing - both extending and shrinking. This pre-dates xfsprogs 3. ext4 was supposed to be a stop gap until a better Linux filesystem came along. jkool702. For anything with higher capability, XFS tends to be faster. I remember being on ext4 using Timeshift but it only supports rsync–so slow. ext4 can claim historical stability, while the consumer advantage of btrfs is snapshots (the ease of subvolumes is nice too, rather than having to partition). It can create, diff and restore snapshots and provides timelined auto-snapping. 84 nvme drives split up into a small ext4 volume and the rest is btrfs. To format an xfs filesystem correctly, use the flag -n ftype=1. Back when Bcachefs debuted in 2015 I ran some initial. If, for example, most your data writes are file add (like storing your camera roll, your movie collection,etc), btrfs snapshots will use virtually no extra space. 1 only) xfs (RHEL 7. It is a copy-on-write (CoW) filesystem supporting. The only concern I have is performance, maybe btrfs in a HDD will be really slow. If not, stick with EXT4, or other more 'classic' solutions. Reviews of EXT4, EXT3, XFS, BTRFS, and ZFS. A maximum. Edit: fsdump / fsrestore means the corresponding system backup and restore to for that file system. ext4 or XFS are otherwise good options if you back up your config. Checksum: if your file (or some metadata) gets corrupted, the checksum will detect and in some case. Snapraid says if the disk size is below 16TB there are no limitations, if above 16TB the parity drive has to be XFS because the parity is a single file and EXT4 has a file size limit of 16TB. In the past, I have often seen statements that EXT4 is better for gaming than XFS. ”. (For example, you might have an ext4 root filesystem, but store most of your data on a zfs or btrfs pool. EXT4. It is the evolution of the most used Linux filesystems (Ext3, Ext2) and promises improved design, better performance, reliability, and features over its predecessors. BTRFS. Linux File System Comparison: XFS vs. Tl;dr: The best filesystem for Unraid. Built By the Slant team. On the other hand, for Linux/Unix-based devices, it might be a bit of a challenge choosing one among many options. Installing and booting with BTRFS has its advantages too. - No RAID. If fs performance is the only or most important thing for you, then use xfs - it's the clear winner, by far. My current setup is /@ for the rootfs, /@home for home dir, works great. 3. Rep: XFS has unbalanced performance, but in the best use case blows away many other formats. For BTRFS, the overall throughput is fairly low (~30k tps), while the jitter is somewhat better and worse than for EXT4/XFS at the same time. 1. The file system has been a solid choice for file servers and data centers since its introduction. Just EXT4, yes. You might also want to consider Btrfs for your array drives, but you should be aware of the potential risks. As for filesystems, not sure I'd bother considering JFS since I believe it may be deprecated out of the kernel soon. Ability to create large volumes of up to 1 PB 1. It is the default file system in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. I hear zfs is good too. Then later, I was actually able to convert that from btrfs-raid10. 0 Intel Skylake 16384MB Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB LLVMpipe Realtek ALC1150 Intel Connection Ubuntu 16. XFS is better larger files and long-term maintaince and stability. Btrfs uses Copy-on-Write (COW), a resource management technique where a. Language: Format: Red Hat Training. Btrfs 與 EXT4 常見問題解答. If you are using Ext2 or Ext3, you can convert the partition to Ext4. 1 Overview of File Systems in Linux. Granted, i just use the automatic partition creater at setup, so it still uses ext4 for the /boot and /boot/efi partitions. Not only does both file systems feature a more robust data assurances then XFS (the mature fsck for Ext4 and checksums and data. AdamV158. for the home lab you can use ext4 it is fast an flexible: grow and shrink are supported. But shrinking is no problem for ext4 or btrfs. Pros: Individual file size: 16GB to 2TB. Btrfs使用校验和来确保数据不会被破坏，另一方面，Ext4不能确保数据的完整性。 Btrfs提供了文件系统中存在的压缩算法，允许在将数据写入系统时在文件系统级进行压缩. The checking task improved 14,6 %. - Linux Kernel 5. Now Fedora just needs to implement it properly like openSUSE. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. It was also during a power outage, and yes I should have had that. BTRFS was clearly in the lead when considering Documents – even better than ZFS with deduplication. We currently recommend XFS for production deployments. It uses a default file system for Linux distribution, including Debian and Ubuntu. It is destined to be replaced by Btrfs as the default Linux filesystem. This article provides a detailed comparison of XFS vs btrfs to help you determine which file system is a better fit for your use case. It you have huge hard drives, BTRFS supports up to 16 times larger size than 1 EXT4 partition. Not a ton of bells and whistles, but they Just Work. " And it can be much faster than btrfs, especially with lots of smaller files. XFS and btrfs are two advanced file systems for Linux that offer significant improvements over ext4. It does its job well. However, the performance of ZFS on FreeBSD/PC-BSD 8. The result of XFS is often more than three times lower than ZFS in this benchmark, and the difference with Btrfs and EXT4 is greater. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system benchmarks on a speedy WD_BLACK SN850 NVMe solid-state drive. Regarding boot drives : Use enterprise grade SSDs, do not use low budget commercial grade equipment. Each of the five file-systems were tested on the same NVM Express SSD from the Linux 4. FYI: btrfs. You get awesome functionality like cp --reflink and btrfs subvolume snapshot -r and btrfs send and btrfs receive . XFS는 1993년 Silicon Graphics에서 개발한 고성능의 64bit 저널링. When comparing XFS vs EXT4, XFS also offers unlimited inode allocation, advanced allocation hinting (in case you need it), and, in recent versions, reflink support. . I’ll take XFS and/or EXT4 any day over rolling another btrfs filesystem that isn’t stable, but has a bunch of gimmicky features any day of the week. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and. ZFS also has more options for caches and such things than EXT4. EXT4 had the best speed at 58MB/s while Btrfs came in slightly behind that at 52MB/s and then ZFS came in at 46MB/s. It was also 164% faster in post-snapshot reads and 17% faster in post-snapshot writes. Ext3 and Ext4 perform better on limited bandwidth (< 200MB/s) and up to ~1,000 IOPS capability. Ext4文件系统是Ext3的继承者，是Linux下的主流文件系统。经过多年的发展，它是目前最稳定的文件系统之一。但是，老实说，与其他Linux文件系统相比，它并不是最好的Linux文件系统。 在XFS vs Ext4方面，XFS在以下几个方面优. BTRFS also had somewhat higher latency than EXT4, meaning that it took longer for files to be accessed on the file system. This article provides a detailed comparison of the three file systems to help you decide which one is the best for your needs. En el caso de los servidores NAS de Synology, tenemos la posibilidad de configurar EXT4 o Btrfs, de hecho, en el asistente de configuración de los volúmenes podremos elegir entre uno y otro sin ningún problema. Ext3 should be out, too, since it's been replaced by ext4. The total throughput is better than with ZFS (40k vs 60k), but the jitter is more severe. Although both ext4 and XFS are excellent at what they do, neither are suited to some of today’s more complex storage challenges. The main thing is to use latest Linux kernels to avoid old kernel Btrfs implementation. Btrfs is expected to offer better. Though not as large of a difference when comparing to an SD card. The check task is involves reading roughly 2000 small files in their entirety and performing some processor intensive tasks on them. A Red Hat training course is available for RHEL 8. However, we also must admit that Btrfs has many advantages that Ext4 doesn’t have, for example:The question is XFS vs EXT4. /boot/efi has to be FAT32 (assuming you are using it as the ESP and not just adding partitions extra partitions under /boot to test how robust the boot sequence is). btrfs sub cr /mnt/@ (the @ alone is the convention for "root directory" in btrfs) btrfs sub cr /mnt/@home. XFS scales much better on modern multi-threaded workloads. Tùy chọn mặc. . As well as ext4. You can easily backup each distro without filling your disk using snapshots. Language: Format: Language and Page Formatting Options. Use XFS for your array drives and Btrfs for your cache pool. Most distros continue to default to ext4. Data integrity protection. Or btrfs, which is making some serious headway again with it becoming the default filesystem for Fedora. Both cases, a mechanical drive. Quota journaling: This avoids the need for lengthy quota consistency checks after a crash. It utilizes a b+tree structure instead of the traditional linear layout found in most filesystems today, allowing it to better manage larger datasets more efficiently than other systems like ext4 or Xfs. Regarding boot drives : Use enterprise grade SSDs, do not use low budget commercial grade equipment. FreeBSD has ports you can install that will allow data transfer of some linux file systems. NTFS OpenBenchmarking. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. It's rigid and inflexible. In this tutorial, we will check Btrfs against Ext4 filesystem, and seek to understand their functionalities, strengths, and weaknesses. ) XFS. What concerns me is reports that its heavier on ssd's due to all the extra metadata tracking etc. We believe that btrfs has the correct feature set and roadmap to serve Ceph in the long-term, but XFS and ext4. Btrfs Benchmarks comparison, here is a wider look at mainline file-systems on the Linux 4. 3 XFS. LVM takes a set of block devices and presents the system with a new (LV) block device with a fixed mapping to physical blocks. XFS vs Btrfs. It also wasn't formatted with -m finobt=1 which is a game-changer for XFS performance with small files and heavy metadata updates. And ext3. If you do hardware RAID, with a dedicated RAID card, just do not use ZFS please, it will break your data at some point. For example btrfs supports transparent file compression. Note that while these tests are not indicative of real-world performance, we can extrapolate these results and use this as one reason. 4. Edit: fsdump / fsrestore means the corresponding system backup and restore to for that file system. This is the first time that the new EXT4 and Btrfs and NILFS2 filesystems have been directly compared when it comes to their disk performance though the results may surprise. Bitrot is possible, but would be extremely rare, same as bit flipping. Tuy nhiên, đối với phân vùng /home chứa các file cá nhân, openSUSE đã quyết định sử dụng hệ thống file XFS thay thế. Looking at benchmarks however it seems to have poor. The benchmark I linked attributes this to copy-on-write behaviour of btrfs. The SATA 3. Both Btrfs and ZFS offer built-in RAID support, but their implementations differ. Rather then using BTRFS, I would use XFS and hope for the best, or using dm-integrity. Btrfs has been a stable part of the Linux kernel since 2013, and you can reformat your hard drives using the file system today. September 18, 2023 Miscellaneous 9 mins read This article will look at the difference between the Btrfs vs. Though personally I'd still go with ext4 primarily because despite recognizing some potential benefits of btrfs, I really don't see them as important for how I use my computers. With ZFS ZVOLs, you can run other file systems like ext4 or xfs for special situations (like as storage for VMs) and still get snapshots/block checksumming. 10 4. Each of the tested file-systems were carried out with the default mount options in an out-of-the-box manner. At least on 13. ) and if/how to preallocate metadata etc. both are great choices, but for me the more generally useful choice is BTRFS. It's not the most cutting-edge file system, but that's good: It means Ext4 is rock-solid and stable. 2 and higher), but only with d_type=true enabled. Let's go over File Systems in this video. XFS, EXT4, and BTRFS are file systems commonly used in Linux-based operating systems. However, the performance of ZFS on FreeBSD/PC-BSD 8. It's solid and tested and I'm not sure I see any benefit to another file system there. Hey Guys! Welcome to XPSTECH. I've also heard that LVM snapshots can. Four years later, Rodeh et al. Because of this, and because EXT4 seems to have better TRIM support, my habit is to make SSD boot/root drives EXT4, and non-root bulk data spinning-rust drives/arrays XFS. 8 snapshot as of last week. 1 fell slightly short of the Linux file-system performance. Checksumming, along with copy-on-write, provides the key method of ensuring file system integrity after unexpected power loss. Back when Bcachefs debuted in 2015 I ran some initial. We recommend btrfs for testing, development, and any non-critical deployments. It's an improved version of the older Ext3 file system. EXT4 being the “safer” choice of the two, it is by the most commonly used FS in linux based systems, and most applications are developed and tested on EXT4. 挂载 btrfs 文件系统 6. also XFS has been recommended by many for MySQL/MariaDB for some time. A maximum partition size of the btrfs file system is 16 exbibytes, as well as maximum file size is 16 exbibytes too. ago. BTRFS has (by far) the better ecosystem of tools and utilities. ZFS brings robustness and stability, while it avoids the corruption of large files. EXT4 vs. . ran defragment utility to compress all existing files. Quota journaling: This avoids the need for lengthy quota consistency checks after a crash. More uniquely, checksumming can detect errors in the data itself. There was a higher risk than upon disconnection or loss of power than some of the files are truncated. For a future article will be a look at non-mainlined file-systems, including ZFS On Linux. • 2 yr. Sun Microsystems originally created it as part of its Solaris operating system. The snapshots do not take up any space. It has features that can scale better than ext4 and is even preferred over ZFS by some users. For reducing the size of a filesystem, there are two purported wats forward, according to xfs developers. It was later developed for Linux. ext4 is an "advanced" version of ext3 with various improvements, basically an upgrade to the ext3 format. No ext4, você pode ativar cotas ao criar o sistema de arquivo ou mais tarde em um sistema de arquivo existente. 8. as @Neoon pointed out ext4 (on your mdraid) works just fine, for that you can rather discuss the usage of raw vs qemu, which driver (virtio, scsi,. Delay allocation. Tbh, it depends on game by game basis Team Fortress 2 will go as low as nearly 50%, same for KSP. We may have lengthy talk on ext vs XFS vs f2fs and btrfs vs zfs and there are many more points to be mentioned, but for regular users. But not enough users follow the guide on and instead do stuff that actually makes the system worse. Linux vs. But I was more talking to the XFS vs EXT4 comparison. Depends on what you're looking for. Btrfs es mucho más rápido de lo que crees basándote en esos benchmarks, ya que no se ajustan a tu caso de uso. Each of the tested file-systems were carried out with the default mount options in an out-of-the-box manner. It can hold up to 1 billion terabytes of data. これらのファイルシステムはEXT4、Btrfs、ZFSであり、XNUMXつのファイルシステムは異なる特性を持ち、いくつかは異なるシナリオでより優れたパフォーマンスを発揮します。 外部4. But unless you intend to use these features, and know how to use them, they are useless. You will see the difference especially with autosaves in Satisfactory for an example. 0 SSD drive used was a 250GB Samsung 850 PRO solid-state drive connected both via SATA and then a SATA. Btrfs Benchmarks comparison, here is a wider look at mainline file-systems on the Linux 4. F2FS vs. 84 nvme drives split up into a small ext4 volume and the rest is btrfs. Linux provides the statx(2) system call interface for retrieving the file birth time for filesystems that support it since kernel version 4. Also, on ZFS, in Linux, it takes some tweaking to get it performing good, so I would suggest to go btrfs or XFS. I suggest to give the arch wiki a read to get an overview what btrfs provides and where it’s limited in comparison to other solutions. BTRFS is an actual file-system. I wouldn't go for ZFS on root although it is fully supported on Proxmox 6. If it is only about reliability and you're in doubt, go with ext4, imho. Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS Storage : 2018-05-30: Bcachefs Linux & Open-Source News: Linux 6. Você deve ativar as cotas na montagem inicial. BTRFS was clearly in the lead when considering Documents – even better than ZFS with deduplication. Since then I have come to value tooling about as much as performance. Currently I'm running on LVM with SSD caching and ext4 fs. That was many years ago, perhaps when btrfs was less ready. EXT4 Vs XFS. org and zfsonlinux. a 3-drive RAID-Z (or RAID-5) would have the same capacity as a 4-drive pool of two mirrored pairs (or RAID-10). Linux có nhiều tùy chọn hệ thống file khác nhau. But none of these will be relevant to a bog standard use case like "browsing the internet and sometimes. 7. Changing the storage driver will make any containers you have already created inaccessible on the local system. But. EXT4 es el sistema de archivos más utilizado en sistemas operativos basados en Linux, este sistema de. could go with btrfs even though it's still in beta and not recommended for production yet. a lot of btrfs' perception of 'breaking' is actually due to checksums (correctly) finding fault on a users data and (correctly) not allowing mounting of the filesystem until it's fixed. Ext4 and xfs are very stable, I prefer xfs with the only downside I've found you can't shrink a partition. I would stick with ext4 for the OS. It's a mature filesystem and offers online defragmentation and can. For anything with higher capability, XFS tends to be faster. Otherwise, I don't think you'd notice the performance difference. 其實你提到一個重點了. Já que muitos usuários Linux, que desejam experimentar o novo sistema, vêm do Ext4, faz sentido enumerar alguns pontos que realçam as diferenças entre os dois: O Ext4 ainda é a melhor escolha, no desktop do usuário comum — por ser mais rápido na transferência de arquivos e por ser mais maduro6,861. But, as always, your specific use case affects this greatly, and there are corner cases where any of. A continuación, os vamos a explicar brevemente las principales características de EXT4 y de Btrfs. Multimedia Sanctuaries: With large files as daily bread, ext4 is indispensable. Some think of the B-tree file system as a better, more modern alternative to ext4. In the time since I chose ext4 for these systems, btrfs seems to have come a long way, so the choice may be harder today. In my second round I made setups with btrfs on the nvme SSD and luks+btrfs on 2TB HDD as RAID1. 4 To 4. XFS 和 ext4 的比较. It supports large file systems and provides excellent scalability and reliability. , a really large number of processes all writing to the filesystem at once). The stock mount options were used for all of the testing.